Education Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 6

Education - Essay ExampleTherefore, it is imperative that occur standards and advance be articulated and publicized (Dalager, 2011). Furthermore, the academic leaders who come up through mental capacity ranks some(a)times develop close relationships with friction matchs and often start viewing themselves as their advocates rather than their administrators. This creates biasness and nepotism, making employees non to believe on the process of rating, also affecting on the validity of data collection. Consequently, peer to peer evaluation is not considered as valid when it comes to students. There is no denying the fact that students play an integral persona in the academic life of the university through their participation in the evaluation of the faculty by the skill Course Evaluation process, but in this case there is a fear of grade splashiness. Students may also get biased in their decision. some other general problems in student evaluation of the faculty could be over i nterpretation about the instructor which only reflects one aspect of program line in the statistics. Students are sometimes unable to judge in an unbiased way or some unique aspects of teaching, therefore, the process concerns for reliability and validity (Diamond, 2011). While doing evaluation from faculty member, it is imperative that they should be entirely aware of terms and policies of the process. Lacking clear guidelines about the process and some specific legal situations causes ambiguity among faculty member and administrator. All such issues must be discussed with faculty and changes should be informed presently to the staff. Coming towards tenure and promotion process, it has been noticed that for a successful institution, it is imperative that the policies described in tenure and promotion process should match the mission of an institution. If the priorities of an institution are not supported by the faculty reward system, it can create problems (Kelly, 2010). In gen eral, the process usually involves an assembly of candidates, in consultation with forefront of department. On this evaluation basis, high rank faculty department decides whether they should proceed with promotion or not. Other high rank officials do external evaluation. With all combine evaluations and recommendations, the decision is being make. If it is in privilege of candidates promotion, and so the head of department writes to dean of institution forwarding decision on with faculty votes. Further action is taken by dean who forwards the dossier to president of institute and which is then discussed in committee. Hence, the decision gets finalized after the board of trustees issues it. Difficulties with tenure process are not just an separate faculty concern that can be solved by minor adjustments they are major institutional dilemma. Universities and colleges all over are working hard to find their place in rich mosaic of American higher education institution (Nebrasca, 2 004). However, it is not impossible to improve the assessment process. It should be made satisfactory by involving more and more faculty members. Faculty should be examined by faculty administrators, legislators and elder faculty members not only through proper conversations but also through questionnaire filling and meeting place statistical data. New faculty member are seen to be caught between the times. They are unable to arrangement performance in accordance to the assessment